Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!fortune!polard
From: polard@fortune.UUCP (Henry Polard)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Hard and fast rules
Message-ID: <5390@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Jul-85 12:02:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.5390
Posted: Wed Jul 24 12:02:01 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 08:15:23 EDT
References: <232@cuuxa.UUCP> <1042@ames.UUCP> <100@denelvx.UUCP> <257@mcc-db.UUCP> <1305@uwmacc.UUCP>
Reply-To: polard@fortune.UUCP (Henry polard)
Distribution: net
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 14
Summary: There are none (maybe)

In article <1305@uwmacc.UUCP> demillo@uwmacc.UUCP (Rob DeMillo) writes:
>   ...advice? Oh, none really. As someone already pointed out, there
>should be no hard and fast rules for something like "dating from
>the office;" each incident should be a judgement call. 
Hear, hear! And this is true of just about every subject dicussed 
in this group.  Repeat after me:

THERE ARE NO HARD AND FAST RULES (maybe)

-- 
Henry Polard (You bring the flames - I'll bring the marshmallows.)
{ihnp4,cbosgd,amd}!fortune!polard
N.B: The words in this posting do not necessarily express the opinions
of me, my employer, or any AI project.