Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!fortune!brower
From: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard Brower)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: A Question for the Women
Message-ID: <5395@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Jul-85 16:52:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.5395
Posted: Wed Jul 24 16:52:55 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 08:16:58 EDT
References: <1266@eagle.UUCP> <philabs.382> <515@unc.UUCP>
Reply-To: brower@fortune.UUCP (Richard brower)
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 18
Summary: 

In article <723@lll-crg.ARPA> simpson@lll-crg.UUCP (Rea simpson) writes:
>2nd question.  I'm going to get shot for this, I can feel it already.  I would
>wonder about a guy that decided to take one of these classes.  It just seems
>like a very feminine thing.  I don't think I would totally reject him for this
>though.  If he seemed interesting I would be willing to "get to know each
>other better".

Well, shot is perhaps a little to strong.  In most species, as sombody else
has already noted, the male is much more showy and colorful than the female.
And until suits came in for men, male clothing was far more colorful than it
is now, with tights, ruffles at neck and wrists, and gobs of gold and jewels.
Besides, many men need help learning the basics in later life because they
were not taught those basics earlier in life.

Oh well, just goes to show that cultural conditioning affects us all.

Richard A. Brower		Fortune Systems
{ihnp4,ucbvax!amd,hpda,sri-unix,harpo}!fortune!brower