Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!mcnc!unc!oliver
From: oliver@unc.UUCP (Bill Oliver)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.singles
Subject: Re: women
Message-ID: <38@unc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 23:32:32 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc.38
Posted: Fri Jul 26 23:32:32 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 09:17:52 EDT
References: <lll-crg.730>
Reply-To: oliver@unc.UUCP (Bill Oliver)
Distribution: net
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 14
Xref: linus net.women:6250 net.singles:7218

In article <lll-crg.730> muffy@lll-crg.ARPA (Muffy Barkocy) writes:
>I believe "aargh" is the appropriate phrase here.  It is
>getting really really annoying to see a singular female
>person referred to as "a women."  "Women" is the plural,
>"woman" is the singular.
>
>As for toher things ...
>				  Muffy

Alas, I will admit to being a dismal typist and abominable proofreader.
But at least I'm not alone.  :-)


Bill Oliver