Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 SMI; site sun.uucp Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!sun!rdh From: rdh@sun.uucp (Robert Hartman) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: "Surprise" Breakups Message-ID: <2553@sun.uucp> Date: Fri, 2-Aug-85 17:33:47 EDT Article-I.D.: sun.2553 Posted: Fri Aug 2 17:33:47 1985 Date-Received: Sun, 4-Aug-85 10:44:07 EDT References: <5557@cbscc.UUCP> <816@ihlpg.UUCP> <190@bcsaic.UUCP> <172@whuts.UUCP> <366@oliven.UUCP> <9472@ucbvax.ARPA> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Lines: 31 > >Exactly. I am so tired of women whining about how men can't fulfill > >their "needs", and they are in fact unable or unwilling to express > >them. ... I thought that *men* were fameous for this :-) Maybe women are unwilling to deal with our defensive (read potentially hurtful) reactions to bad news? > >This gets me POed too! Before my wife left me I had no idea that > >there was any problems between us. ... Well, one could *ask*, once in a while, and be ready to deal with an honest answer. > I have found that "gripe meetings" are a good solution to this problem. > Early on in a relationship you agree to a weekly scheduled "meeting" > in which you spend some time talking about problems ... I like the idea of setting up a safe context in which to air bad (and good!) news. Unfortunately, I have a hard time believing that bad news is amenable to a regular schedule. A regular session for getting practice at conveying and accepting needs, desires and suggestions, in a supportive way, is probably a good thing. But if it turns into a regularly scheduled trashing, who needs it! > In addition to the weekly meetings, the following "rule" is > also helpful: whenever there is something that is really bothering > one of the people, they can "call a meeting" ... If you are interested enough in someone to hear what they have to say, eventually the need for "practice", and for a "schedule", should go away. -bob.