Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!teddy!rdp
From: rdp@teddy.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Re: space delivery
Message-ID: <1027@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 26-Jul-85 16:35:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: teddy.1027
Posted: Fri Jul 26 16:35:27 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jul-85 05:37:00 EDT
References: <2761@mordor.UUCP> <319@baylor.UUCP>
Reply-To: rdp@teddy.UUCP (Richard D. Pierce)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 13

In article <319@baylor.UUCP> peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:
>Wouldn't the calcium deficiency noted in free fall SERIOUSLY harm the fetus (who
>can't use a treadmill, or would the mother's exercising serve?)?
>-- 
>	Peter da Silva (the mad Australian)
>		UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
>		MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076

Having just gone throught two pregnancies with my wife, rest assured that
no fetus that is even slight healthy has a problem with exercise. One of
our kids was so active the my wife had a dislocated rib as a result! No,
I don't think excersize for the fetus or the neo-natal is a problem. Now,
the mess at delivery is another issue...