Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utastro.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!utastro!ethan From: ethan@utastro.UUCP (Ethan Vishniac) Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Re: Voyager, on to Uranus. Message-ID: <464@utastro.UUCP> Date: Thu, 1-Aug-85 11:19:15 EDT Article-I.D.: utastro.464 Posted: Thu Aug 1 11:19:15 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Aug-85 04:17:55 EDT References: <1792@aecom.UUCP> <1746@bmcg.UUCP> <1049@ames.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: U. Texas, Astronomy, Austin, TX Lines: 28 > > > > Sorry Ethan, this is not entirely true. While it is true that there is no > > deliberate target, someone at JPL [sorry, forgot to copy his name down, > > he deserves the credit] calculated the motions of local stars to 100,000 > > years. Both Voyagers will pass to around 1 Light-year (approx) of the > > star AC +79 3888 in about 40,000 years. AC +79 3888 is currently 17 > > light years away and is expected to be about 3 light years away by that time. > > [The velocity is left as an excercise to elementary school students...]. ;-) > > After Neptune encounter of V 2, a decision will be made whether to use the > > remaining manuveuring fuel to improve the current trajectory for a > > closer encounter with AC +79 3888. > > > > --eugene miya Actually, something about this puzzles me. Assuming that the space velocity of AC +79 3888 is only known to within 1 km/sec I get that even we aimed something at that star we would expect to miss by 13% of a light year. This is about a trillion kilometers (about 8000 AU). Admittedly there may be no other use for the manuveuring fuel than aiming at AC +79 3888, but no one could reasonably expect anyone there to notice it as it goes by. I'm not much on velocity determinations, but isn't this basically right? -- "Don't argue with a fool. Ethan Vishniac Borrow his money." {charm,ut-sally,ut-ngp,noao}!utastro!ethan Department of Astronomy University of Texas