Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site teddy.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!teddy!rdp
From: rdp@teddy.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Re: Re: space delivery
Message-ID: <1080@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 1-Aug-85 11:05:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: teddy.1080
Posted: Thu Aug  1 11:05:33 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Aug-85 10:43:41 EDT
References: <2761@mordor.UUCP> <319@baylor.UUCP> <1027@teddy.UUCP> <186@kitty.UUCP>
Reply-To: rdp@teddy.UUCP (Richard D. Pierce)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 13

In article <186@kitty.UUCP> peter@kitty.UUCP (Peter DaSilva) writes:
>> > [ME]
>> >Wouldn't the calcium deficiency noted in free fall SERIOUSLY harm the fetus (who
>> >can't use a treadmill, or would the mother's exercising serve?)?
>> 
>> Having just gone throught two pregnancies with my wife, rest assured that
>> no fetus that is even slight healthy has a problem with exercise...
>
>It was my understanding that you needed a certain kind of excersize in free
>fall. Am I wrong?

No, you just don't understand what fetuses seem to spend most of their
time doing is excersizing. And they don't need gravity to do it!