Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!decvax!minow
From: minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin Minow)
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.text
Subject: Re: International UNIX
Message-ID: <93@decvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 22-Jul-85 21:15:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: decvax.93
Posted: Mon Jul 22 21:15:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 02:09:56 EDT
References: <1074@diku.UUCP>
Reply-To: minow@decvax.UUCP (Martin minow)
Organization: DEC - ULTRIX Engineering Group
Lines: 20
Keywords: Internationalization
Xref: linus net.unix:4521 net.text:447

Keld Joern Simonsen suggests, probably with tongue in cheek,
that C would be a useful programming languge if only European users
could use their full national character set in identifiers.

To my knowledge, no commercially available computer language --
including a few developed in Scandinavia such as Algol 60 (for
Trask and Besk), Algol-Genius (for the Datasaab machines) and
Simula (for Dec PDP10s) permit national letters in variable
names, so the marketplace hasn't exactly mandated their inclusion.

I would also point out that national replacement character sets
are being superseded by the Draft ISO/ANSI/ECMA 8-bit character
set called Latin 1.  Latin 1 has a unique representation for the
national letters of the major European languages and, once the
initial problems of going from a seven-bit character set to
an eight-bit set have been solved, should prove to be a much
simpler representation to deal with for international products.

Martin Minow (fil.kand. Stockholms Universitet)
decvax!minow