Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site alberta.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!mhuxv!mhuxh!mhuxj!mhuxn!ihnp4!alberta!ken
From: ken@alberta.UUCP (Ken Hruday)
Newsgroups: net.travel
Subject: Re: Airport safety
Message-ID: <589@alberta.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 16-Jul-85 16:17:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: alberta.589
Posted: Tue Jul 16 16:17:01 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 22-Jul-85 05:15:29 EDT
References: <134@rruxa.UUCP> <19700005@ada-uts.UUCP> <1733@amdahl.UUCP> <1734@amdahl.UUCP> <671@water.UUCP> <256@aero.ARPA>
Reply-To: ken@pembina.UUCP (Ken Hruday)
Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
Lines: 17

In article <256@aero.ARPA> sivan@aero.UUCP (Sivan Mahadevan (ISRO)) writes:
>-----
>	By Canadians do you mean Canadian Citizens or Canadians of European
>ancestory?  There were 279 "Canadians" on that flight but they were all of
>Indian origin.  I guess that your use of the term Canadians is terribly
>confusing here.
>
>					Sivan Mahadevan

There is nothing confusing about the word "Canadians". This word is used
to describe any individuals who are citizens of Canada. The fact that
most of the Canadians on the flight were of East Indian origin is immaterial.
This does not mean that they are any less "Canadian" then those of European
ancestory. There is nothing confusing about this.
	
						Ken Hruday
					  University of Alberta