Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site hammer.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!harvard!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!orca!hammer!seifert
From: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Newsgroups: net.video
Subject: Re: counters on VCRS
Message-ID: <1394@hammer.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 19-Jul-85 00:59:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: hammer.1394
Posted: Fri Jul 19 00:59:24 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jul-85 02:02:19 EDT
References: <433@zinfandel.UUCP> <1346@hammer.UUCP> <174@tekcrl.UUCP> <334@varian.UUCP> <1369@hammer.UUCP> <347@mit-vax.UUCP>
Reply-To: seifert@hammer.UUCP (Snoopy)
Organization: The Daisy Hill Puppy Farm
Lines: 14
Summary: as long as we're going off the deep end...

In article <347@mit-vax.UUCP> csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe) writes:
>
>Hate to break it to you, but cassette is a big lose in bandwidth anyway.
>Why settle for anything less than 2 inch broadcast quality with a
>TIMECODING track that can be fed to your 68000 based computer that DOES
>RUN UNIX. Seriously, I can't stand snobs :-).

broadcast quality?  ick!  why not go with 70mm film?  So the rental
fees are a little higher, isn't quality worth it?  68000?  You mean the
VHS of micros?  The 32032 blows it away.  But as long as we're talking
high-end, why not a Cray 2?

Bavarian Beagle
tektronix!hammer!seifert