Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dartvax.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!decvax!dartvax!markv From: markv@dartvax.UUCP (Mark F. Vita) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Women in combat (actually firefighters) Message-ID: <3359@dartvax.UUCP> Date: Wed, 17-Jul-85 11:58:57 EDT Article-I.D.: dartvax.3359 Posted: Wed Jul 17 11:58:57 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 19-Jul-85 01:37:10 EDT References: <2555@randvax.UUCP> <4160017@csd2.UUCP> <295@tektools.UUCP> Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Lines: 33 > >It depends on the individual. If I had a choice between the woman who > >picks Rodney Dangerfield up in the beer commercial and Woody Allen, > >I'd have to go with the woman. > > So we're back to a woman having to be (at least) twice as good as a man > to be accepted, eh? What a crock. > > Barbara Zanzig > tektronix!tektools!barbaraz Whoa, there. Nowhere in the original message is it implied that "a woman has to be twice as good as a man to be accepted". The person who posted the article stated quite clearly that it *depends on the individual*. It was assumed that the woman in the beer commercial was at least as physically able as most capable firefighters, and that Woody Allen is not. Implied was that the qualifications for being a firefighter should be based on a set of physical requirements which are applied equally to applicants of either sex. I don't know what you were thinking. That women must be twice as strong as Woody Allen to become firefighters? Somehow I don't think it would fly. :^) Please, Ms. Zanzig, in the future carefully read an article and the preceding discussion and make sure the brain is in gear before igniting the flamethrower. This sort of unfounded, antagonistic flaming serves no constructive purpose. -- Mark Vita Dartmouth College USENET: {decvax,cornell,linus,astrovax}!dartvax!markv ARPA: markv%dartmouth@csnet-relay CSNET: markv@dartmouth