Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihu1m.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihu1m!gadfly From: gadfly@ihu1m.UUCP (Gadfly) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: Equal Pay For Work of Equal Value is a serious blow to Women Message-ID: <531@ihu1m.UUCP> Date: Sat, 20-Jul-85 12:46:17 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1m.531 Posted: Sat Jul 20 12:46:17 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 22-Jul-85 06:48:42 EDT References: <308@looking.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 37 -- > Well, the Ontario Government announced today that it would soon be > bringing in EPFWOEV legislation in the public sector... > > But the Feminist lobby that worked for this was not satisfied. > They wanted to know when the law would come into the private sector... > > They should curse the day such legislation comes. > > Let's say a secretary makes on average $13K. But the wage police > say that such a secretary should make $16K. Where does this $3K > come from? As an employer, I know. It means that I will wait longer > to hire a secretary. If I were a big business, it would mean fewer > secretaries in general. You will have to be higher up before you > rate a private secretary. > > The result - even fewer jobs for secretaries. Sad to say because of > sex sterotypes this also means fewer jobs for women... > Ideology has little to do with it. It's facts and numbers, plain > and simple. > > Brad Templeton I'd love to see either the public or private sectors try to make do with substantially fewer secretaries--the whole fabric of business would fall apart. I'd also love to see this endless piddle of simplistic libertarian dogma--submitted entirely by oh so rational men--the hell out of net.women. You've made your point, guys--now go beat each other up somewhere else. -- *** *** JE MAINTIENDRAI ***** ***** ****** ****** 20 Jul 85 [2 Thermidor An CXCIII] ken perlow ***** ***** (312)979-7753 ** ** ** ** ..ihnp4!iwsl8!ken *** ***