Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site elsie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!elsie!sck
From: sck@elsie.UUCP (Steve Kaufman)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Equal Pay For Work of Equal Value is a serious blow to Women
Message-ID: <5176@elsie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 23-Jul-85 14:51:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: elsie.5176
Posted: Tue Jul 23 14:51:04 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 01:26:51 EDT
References: <308@looking.UUCP> <531@ihu1m.UUCP>
Organization: NIH-LEC, Bethesda, MD
Lines: 14
Summary: censorship in net.women?  Not a good idea

In article <531@ihu1m.UUCP>, Ken Perlman (gadfly@ihu1m.UUCP)
concludes his rebuttal to someone else's argument against
"comparable worth" pay scales (Equal Pay For Work of Equal Value)
with:

> 
> I'd also love to see this endless piddle of
> simplistic libertarian dogma--submitted entirely by oh so rational
> men--the hell out of net.women.  You've made your point, guys--now
> go beat each other up somewhere else.
>

	Where is it written that only certain points of view
	are allowed to be expressed in net.women?