Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!sophie
From: sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Re: PMS and incompetence
Message-ID: <1552@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Jul-85 11:27:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1552
Posted: Thu Jul 25 11:27:15 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jul-85 12:17:30 EDT
References: <993@ubc-vision.CDN> <202@ihlpl.UUCP> <1364@peora.UUCP>
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 17

> 
> 	This may be a stupid question, but how many female heads of
> 	state, or male for that matter, have there been recently
> 	that were young enough for PMS to be a consideration. It
> 	seems to me that few heads of state are under 50.

Just because you're so logical doesn't mean that you're that smart..
We've already got your argument covered.  You see, after PMS is over,
comes :  MENOPAUSE!!!!!!   so women will never be free of RHC
(the Ragin Hormones Condition)

Anyway, who'd want a president with a dry vagina.

(ok, ok, I'll add my <-: <-: for those obtuse people out there)
-- 
Sophie Quigley
{allegra|decvax|ihnp4|linus|watmath}!utzoo!mnetor!sophie