Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site amdcad.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!amdcad!phil
From: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Equal Pay For Work of Equal Value is a serious blow to Women
Message-ID: <2108@amdcad.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Jul-85 01:45:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdcad.2108
Posted: Thu Jul 25 01:45:48 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 26-Jul-85 07:41:35 EDT
References: <308@looking.UUCP> <1417@mnetor.UUCP>
Reply-To: phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai)
Organization: AMD, Sunnyvale, California
Lines: 8


So the argument seems to be that if you have to pay women more than
they get right now there won't be as many jobs for them and so EPFWEV
is a bad idea? I don't buy this at all. If a person is worth a certain
wage, she should get it. I suspect that people who want low paying menial
jobs can find them anyway.

--