Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!ihlpl!zubbie
From: zubbie@ihlpl.UUCP (Jeanette Zobjeck)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.social
Subject: Re: "pleasant" work vs. "dangerous" work
Message-ID: <249@ihlpl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 25-Jul-85 13:21:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpl.249
Posted: Thu Jul 25 13:21:49 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Jul-85 01:38:55 EDT
References: <688@lll-crg.ARPA> <547@hou2g.UUCP> <218@ihlpl.UUCP> <1086@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.women:6651 net.social:851

> I have troubles with the phrase <therefore legally due to the child>.  I
> suppose that technically this is correct but I much prefer to think of it
> as a moral responsibility.  I fathered the child and I should expect to
> share in the support of that child.  What the government decides in regard
> to this issue is actually immaterial to me.
> 
> 
> Take care,
> Peter B

In as much as I was speaking of child support as defined by the courts I
was correct. I think I like Peter's definition better.


-- 
Jeanette Zobjeck ihnp4!ihlpl!zubbie
================================================================================
These are my opinions!
I worked for them and I intend to enjoy them.
Handle carefully or else someone might think they are yours also.
================================================================================