Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!sophie
From: sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Birth Control
Message-ID: <1926@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 30-Aug-85 10:43:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.1926
Posted: Fri Aug 30 10:43:45 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Aug-85 12:40:53 EDT
References: <718@mit-vax.UUCP>
Reply-To: sophie@mnetor.UUCP (Sophie Quigley)
Distribution: net
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 14
Summary: 

In article <718@mit-vax.UUCP> csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe) writes:
>
>It is not as easy as you
>think to medically prove virginity. Certainly for males it's impossible.
>As for females, while an intact hymen is a guarantee of virginity, a
>broken hymen is not necessarily indicative of a non-virgin.

Actually, an intact hymen is not even a guarantee of virginity.  I have
heard of a medical condition where the hymen is so strong that it simply
stretches back into place after intercourse, making it very painful.
(I think the treatment is to remove it surgically).
-- 
Sophie Quigley
{allegra|decvax|ihnp4|linus|watmath}!utzoo!mnetor!sophie