Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gcc-bill.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!gcc-bill!john
From: john@gcc-bill.ARPA (John Allred)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Reply in mail, please...
Message-ID: <296@gcc-bill.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 2-Sep-85 12:38:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: gcc-bill.296
Posted: Mon Sep  2 12:38:08 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Sep-85 05:23:04 EDT
References: <134@graffiti.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@gcc-bill.UUCP (John Allred)
Organization: General Computer Company, Cambridge Ma (Home of the HyperDrive)
Lines: 14

In article <134@graffiti.UUCP> peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes:

>Why hasn't anybody opposed abortion on the grounds that it is a dangerous
>operation for the mother that can irreparably damage her cervix and uterus?
>I haven't seen anybody using this argument, despite the fact that it has a
>great deal more validity than the ones I've seen people using.

Probably because the mother's cervix and uterus are her concern, and no
one elses.

-- 
John Allred
General Computer Company 
uucp: seismo!harvard!gcc-bill!john