Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxd!rlr From: rlr@pyuxd.UUCP (Rich Rosen) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: Planned Parenthood posting Message-ID: <1632@pyuxd.UUCP> Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 15:41:46 EDT Article-I.D.: pyuxd.1632 Posted: Tue Sep 3 15:41:46 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Sep-85 02:42:02 EDT References: <639@ttidcc.UUCP> <10929@rochester.UUCP> Organization: Whatever we're calling ourselves this week Lines: 70 >>> I can see that from your question that you are not yet fully developed in >>> the area of intuitive reasoning. >>Yes, of course. You can tell this from the fact that I disagree with you. > No, how about just disagreeable. Anyone who disagrees with you is disagreeable? In your last article to someone else, you said "Experts? Well that rules you out?" to someone else you disagreed with. >>Not believing in a god, I sure don't. But it makes me wish that there were >>a just god of some sort to take care of your kids in light of what you might >>be doing to them. You, my friend, seem to be beyond both hope and prayer, >>set in cement as you are. > Did your parents tell you at an 'early age' that there is no God or did you > just deduce this yourself at an 'early age'. Given that my parents believe in God, I learned this on my own. At what some may consider an early age. >>Nice to see you looked up the words "punk rock" to replace "acid >>rock". You'll make a real "hep" parent. :-) > Good of you to realize that punk rock replaced acid rock. But unfortunately > 'punk' and its like is even more decadent than its predecessor. Care to explain that? With examples? And clarifications on how "decadent" and dangerous it is? From the man who brought us the dangers of "acid rock"? >>> But seriously, I can't agree with you more that a lot parents are destroying >>> the lives of their children. And society will untimately take the brunt of >>> the errors of parents. What we are seeing in parents could get worse or >>> better. If it gets worse, then more misfits are dumped into the stream of >>> society, which in turn, turn out more misfits and so on. But may I be so >>> bold in stating that I believe that good parents hold the edge over not so >>> good parents in numbers. And while I believe this is true, then I must also >>> hold to my beliefs that the main responsiblity of raising children must >>> remain in the hands of the parents, not schools, or any other outside >>> organization. And I will attempt to defeat anything that trys to undermine >>> the authority of the parents or to destroy the family unit of America. >>(Someone play the Stars and Stripes Forever and wave the flag.) You have >>a built-in contradiction there. It is precisely miserable parents like you >>would apparently be who are in fact willfully destroying the "family unit" >>of America. > Thank you. In the remark above, you have helped my point tremendously. > You exhibit the twisted logic that is very much evident in today's youth. > Turn up your headphones, and learn from the 'logic' of some heavy metal (brain > damaged) rock group. Even the albumn cover I saw with a bloodied chain saw > being extracted from someone's groin must have some social redeeming value > when examined with the 'logic' of the illogical. I have "helped your point"? Why not tell us what is twisted about my logic? (I'll tell you why not: inability.) So now you've also picked up the term "heavy metal". Bra-vo! Doing research! Watching MTV? Which album was this, I'd like to get a copy, after all, people buy albums based on their attraction to the album cover, not the music inside... > PS. You asked what kinky sex was, well it's this way, normal sex is when > you rub your lover with a feather, kinky is when the chicken is still > attached. Whew! I'm so relieved. By Ray's standards, my sex life does not qualify as kinky. (Actually I was kind of hoping that it would.) -- Life is complex. It has real and imaginary parts. Rich Rosen ihnp4!pyuxd!rlr