Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cylixd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!harpo!whuxlm!akgua!akgub!cylixd!charli
From: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: The Status of the Fetus and Its Rights
Message-ID: <248@cylixd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Sep-85 15:43:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: cylixd.248
Posted: Wed Sep  4 15:43:02 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Sep-85 04:24:24 EDT
References: <436@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA> <1631@pyuxd.UUCP>
Reply-To: charli@cylixd.UUCP (Charli Phillips)
Organization: RCA Cylix Communications , Memphis, TN
Lines: 19
Summary: 

Does anyone else read these long diatribes between Rosen and Newton,
or those between Forsythe and Samuelson?  When I see a posting that
says 2% at the bottom, and I see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>
and so forth, I skip the posting!  I don't subscribe to net.flame,
and I have no interest in reading pages of flames here.

I find it neither useful nor interesting to read postings which do no
more than impugn character and motives, argue semantics, and the like.

These long point-counterpoint arguments could be handled with the R key
instead of the F, gentlemen.  Public displays of invective are in poor
taste.  

		charli