Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece
From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Reply in mail, please...
Message-ID: <24000002@ccvaxa>
Date: Wed, 4-Sep-85 10:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.24000002
Posted: Wed Sep  4 10:19:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Sep-85 05:02:30 EDT
References: <134@graffiti.UUCP>
Lines: 12
Nf-ID: #R:graffiti.UUCP:-13400:ccvaxa:24000002:000:395
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece    Sep  4 09:19:00 1985


> Why hasn't anybody opposed abortion on the grounds that it is a
> dangerous operation for the mother that can irreparably damage her
> cervix and uterus?  /* Written  3:51 pm  Aug 30, 1985 by
> peter@graffiti.UUCP in ccvaxa:net.abortion */
----------
Because it is statistically much less dangerous than carrying a fetus
to term and giving birth.

--
scott preece
ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece