Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!sas
From: sas@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: The Status of the Fetus and Its Rights
Message-ID: <30521@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 11-Sep-85 19:30:47 EDT
Article-I.D.: lanl.30521
Posted: Wed Sep 11 19:30:47 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Sep-85 02:12:23 EDT
References: <436@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA> <1631@pyuxd.UUCP> <1260@brl-tgr.ARPA> <1213@ihlpg.UUCP>
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 17

> Bravo Matt. It's a pleasure to read a posting from someone on the opposite
> side of the issue that I can wholeheartedly agree with.  Not only that,
> but you have hit the nail on the head.  Abortion IS a question of values,
> not facts.  It is a sad choice between two evils, terminating the life of
> an embryo or fetus, and forcing a woman to bear an unwanted child to
> term.  It is not a theological discussion of when life begins, or what
> name you call the fetus.  Many of us have made this point many times,
> but the endless insoluble "when does human life begin" fights go on and on.
> Bravo again.
> -- 
> Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan

Bravo to you Bill, I am glad to see someone on the *other* side say that
it is "a sad choice between two evils".  I am tired of hearing both
sides ignoring the evils on the other side.

					Steve Smith