Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mnetor.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!pchan
From: pchan@mnetor.UUCP (Peter Chan)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.flame
Subject: Re: Halogen headlights -- ARGH!
Message-ID: <2044@mnetor.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 13:57:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: mnetor.2044
Posted: Fri Sep  6 13:57:11 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Sep-85 15:18:55 EDT
References: <1343@umcp-cs.UUCP> <305@ihlpl.UUCP> <655@rduxb.UUCP>
Reply-To: pchan@mnetor.UUCP (Peter Chan)
Organization: Computer X (CANADA) Ltd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lines: 38
Xref: utcs net.auto:7766 net.flame:11534
Summary: 

In article <655@rduxb.UUCP> daw1@rduxb.UUCP (WILLIAMS) writes:
>
>	Apparently you run across a lot of misaligned headlights.
>You probably pass a lot of halogens that are correctly aligned and
>don't know that they are halogens. If correctly aligned, halogens are
>not a problem. Misaligned non-halogens are a problem, too.
>
>
>					Doug Williams

Here you said correctly aimed halogens are not a problem, but in your
earlier posting, you said:

>
>Despite the fact my headlights is perfectly aligned, some people think
>that my halogens on low beam are regulars on high beam.
>

I don't understand now, you are condradicting yourself. If your halogens 
are probably aligned, why do people still think that there is a problem? 
Are your halogens different from those halogens? Or maybe the following 
lines

>... If correctly aligned, halogens are
>not a problem. Misaligned non-halogens are a problem, too.

should read as:

>... If correctly aligned, halogens are
>not a problem. :-) Misaligned non-halogens are a problem, too.

		 ^
		 |
		 |
	 (should be added)

Peter Chan
mnetor!pchan