Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site convex Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!tmorris From: tmorris@convex.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: RE: V V-6's in Vettes Message-ID: <82600010@convex> Date: Mon, 9-Sep-85 14:13:00 EDT Article-I.D.: convex.82600010 Posted: Mon Sep 9 14:13:00 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 12-Sep-85 10:37:10 EDT Lines: 40 Nf-ID: #N:convex:82600010:000:1761 Nf-From: convex.UUCP!tmorris Sep 9 13:13:00 1985 For those Corvette "Purists" who don't want to see a vette with a v-6 , consider: 1. The first vettes (53-54) had an inline 6 ! (of course the three carbs helped ) 2. When you imagine a V-6 in a vette , don't imagine the doggy performance of a 79-84 full-size car with a V-6: A. The power - to - weight ratio is considerably better. B. GM's labs , at the time I left their employ in 1984 , had a 229 V-6 off-road engine developing 725 HP ! Although performance won't ever reach that in a pro- duction auto , it'll be an awful lot better than the wimpy , rough-idling V-6 we're all used to now. C. The 231 v-6 was one of the "dirtiest" engines ever made , from a pollution standpoint. To make it pass EPA , they had to heap on the emission controls , drastically de-tune it , and generally band-aid it to death ! There are fixes on top of fixes in its emission controls ,and the EPA is still nailing them on it. D. Some new fuel injection techniques are helping the 229 V-6 to burn cleaner in the combustion chamber , requiring less clean-up afterwards. The result is a HIGH PERFORMANCE STREET ENGINE. 3. The vette will continue to get lighter , and MUST get better mileage to raise GM's fleet mileage average . 4. Finally , the combination of lighter car and more powerful V-6 engines could wind up giving you a better power /weight ratio than todays vette with a 305 V8 , and having the engine in the middle wouldn't hurt cornering a bit !