Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.columbia
Subject: Re: More Newsgroup Changes
Message-ID: <689@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 29-Aug-85 11:55:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.689
Posted: Thu Aug 29 11:55:16 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 2-Sep-85 03:42:09 EDT
References: <1430@cbosgd.UUCP> <289@sesame.UUCP> <763@asgb.UUCP> <416@mhuxm.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.news.group:3599 net.columbia:1646
Summary: 

In article <416@mhuxm.UUCP> rhib@mhuxm.UUCP (irving) writes:
>I'd like to see net.columbia stick around as our news category; I never
>read net.space.  And just to cause controversy, I feel that those who
>spend much time feeding the newsgroup (i.e. Adam Buchsbaum et al) deserve
>a larger say than most of us in any renaming debate.
>
	It seems that my interpretation of this suggestion was a lot
different than many people's. I do *not* think he was suggesting
*merging* net.culumbia with the *current* net.space. He seemed to be
suggesting *renaming* the group as net.space *after* moveing the
current net.space to net.sci.space, thus keeping them seperate. Most
of the no votes I have seen have seemed to assume he was suggesting a
merger of the groups.
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa