Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scirtp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp!scott
From: scott@scirtp.UUCP (Scott Crenshaw)
Newsgroups: net.women,net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: A suggestion for a ground rule in any pornography debate
Message-ID: <417@scirtp.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Sep-85 15:56:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: scirtp.417
Posted: Tue Sep 10 15:56:24 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Sep-85 23:45:46 EDT
References: <5660@tekecs.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: SCI Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 13
Xref: linus net.women:6883 net.politics:10197 net.flame:10973

> But seriously, I suggest this rule: Anyone who contributes an article
> concerning pornography must give examples or otherwise specify what
> they consider to be pornography and what they consider to be erotica.
> 

	Good idea !  I think that sample photographs of what they consider
pornography should be distributed along with it. Just so we know what 
they're talking about . . .
-- 
	   Scott Crenshaw		{akgua,decvax}!mcnc!rti-sel!scirtp
	   SCI Systems , Inc. 		Research Triangle Park, NC 

The views represented may or may not be those of my employer.