Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-sem.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!brl-sem!jeffh
From: jeffh@brl-sem.ARPA (the Shadow)
Newsgroups: net.games
Subject: Re: Rubik's 4x4x4(x4) cube
Message-ID: <392@brl-sem.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 29-Aug-85 12:45:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-sem.392
Posted: Thu Aug 29 12:45:45 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 1-Sep-85 08:18:57 EDT
References: <115@duvel.UUCP> <3600005@prism.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeffh@brl-semnes (VLD/VMB) (the Shadow)
Organization: only the Shadow knows
Lines: 16

In article <3600005@prism.UUCP> mer@prism.UUCP writes:
>
>Not an answer to your question but your query made me think "wouldn't it
>be neat to have a 4x4x4x4 Rubik's cube", since that's the logical
>extension.  I wonder how you'd solve it.

I wonder how you'd BUILD it.  After all, mathematicians and physicists
can't agree on what the fourth dimension is, let alone how one would
create an object in 4-space.

		"Some people are born to obscurity.
		 Others only achieve it through diligent effort."

			the Shadow
			ARPA:	<jeffh@brl>
			UUCP:	{seismo,decvax,cbosgd}!brl!jeffh