Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cisden.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!hao!nbires!boulder!cisden!phillips
From: phillips@cisden.UUCP (Tom Phillips)
Newsgroups: net.games
Subject: Re: Rubik's 4x4x4(x4) cube
Message-ID: <274@cisden.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 13:56:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: cisden.274
Posted: Tue Sep  3 13:56:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Sep-85 07:22:17 EDT
References: <115@duvel.UUCP> <3600005@prism.UUCP> <392@brl-sem.ARPA>
Reply-To: phillips@trantor.UUCP (Tom Phillips)
Followup-To: /dev/null
Distribution: net
Organization: ConTel Information Systems, Denver
Lines: 10
Keywords: Rubik's Dimensions
Summary: Starting to get beyond net.games

In article <392@brl-sem.ARPA> jeffh@brl-semnes (VLD/VMB) (the Shadow) writes:
>>Not an answer to your question but your query made me think "wouldn't it
>>be neat to have a 4x4x4x4 Rubik's cube", since that's the logical
>>extension.  I wonder how you'd solve it.
>I wonder how you'd BUILD it.  After all, mathematicians and physicists
>can't agree on what the fourth dimension is, let alone how one would
>create an object in 4-space.
*The* 4th dimension?  Which one is *the* third dimension.  *Pick* a fourth
dimension.
					Tommy Phillips