Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site srcsip.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!srcsip!meier
From: meier@srcsip.UUCP (Christopher M. Meier)
Newsgroups: net.graphics
Subject: Re: Image processing articles?
Message-ID: <1112@srcsip.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 1-Sep-85 21:26:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: srcsip.1112
Posted: Sun Sep  1 21:26:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 01:07:35 EDT
References: <301@ur-laser.uucp> <274@aoa.UUCP>
Reply-To: meier@srcsip.UUCP (Christopher M. Meier)
Organization: Honeywell SRC (SIP), Mpls MN
Lines: 21
Keywords: Image processing, computer graphics
Summary: 

>>So what happened to the 25-30 people who voted "yes" for the IP group?
>>
>>			{seismo,allegra}!rochester!ur-laser!nitin.uucp
>
>To sum up, I feel there is a hardware difference between IP and CG.  
>Most postings to .graphics relate to graphic terminals, graphic
>software, and printer/plotters.  I do agree there should be some 
>honest discussion/interest related to image aquisition, 
>pre/post-processing, analog video signal processing, (not VCR, Beta, etc.)
>vision systems and real-time scene analysis to warrant the creation of
>net.image.
>		Dean Wormell
I am one of 50+ people who work on image processing at Honeywell.  We are
interested in the creation of net.image for the discussion of image proc.
topics.  I am sure there are other IP groups out there, let's here from
you.

Christopher Meier
Honeywell Systems & Research Center
Signal & Image Processing
ihnp4!umn-cs!srcsip!meier