Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!chris
From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP (Chris Torek)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: How to declare a pointer to function returning pointer to function
Message-ID: <1421@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 28-Aug-85 11:19:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.1421
Posted: Wed Aug 28 11:19:44 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 29-Aug-85 08:46:13 EDT
References: <630@vaxine.UUCP>
Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD
Lines: 12

> I couldn't resist trying this.  Cdecl claims no problem declaring
> something to be a pointer to a function returning a pointer to a
> function returning int:

There *is* no problem declaring that.  The problem is declaring a
function returning a pointer to a function returning a pointer to
a function returning a pointer to a ..., ad infinitum.  *There is
no base type in the definition*.
-- 
In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci Dept (+1 301 454 4251)
UUCP:	seismo!umcp-cs!chris
CSNet:	chris@umcp-cs		ARPA:	chris@maryland