Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!brl-tgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-tgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn <gwyn>)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C bites Dog! / project proposal
Message-ID: <1101@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 29-Aug-85 14:48:51 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1101
Posted: Thu Aug 29 14:48:51 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 31-Aug-85 09:19:34 EDT
References: <872@brl-tgr.ARPA> <2968@sdcc3.UUCP> <159@chinet.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab
Lines: 9

Judging by rlk's language proposal, he doesn't like those things
that C lovers think are C's greatest advantages.  He is certainly
entitled to his opinion (and his own language), so I hope we can
avoid zillions of return flames on this.

> ... but I personnaly prefer the clarity of PL/I to the terseness of C.

Besides, what can one say to a person who thinks PL/I is
distinguished by its clarity?