Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!utah-cs!brownc
From: brownc@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric C. Brown)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C Style
Message-ID: <3470@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Sep-85 11:57:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3470
Posted: Fri Sep 13 11:57:12 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 14-Sep-85 16:55:42 EDT
References: <180@chinet.UUCP>
Reply-To: brownc@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric C. Brown)
Organization: Univ of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 17

In article <180@chinet.UUCP> rlk@chinet.UUCP (Richard L. Klappal) writes:
>	Which of the following code segments is more understandable,
>	(readable, structured, etc) given the current attitudes
>	about the presence of goto's in programming?
>

Well, neither.
how about
	for ( ch = getch(); ch < '1' || ch > '5') && ch != 'E'); ch = getch())
		putchar(BELL);
	addch(ch);
	refresh();
which ought to do the same thing.

Eric C. Brown
brownc@utah-cs
..!{decvax, ihnp4}!utah-cs!brownc