Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!wmartin From: wmartin@brl-tgr.ARPA (Will Martin ) Newsgroups: net.legal Subject: Re: Legal question on signatures Message-ID: <1056@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Wed, 28-Aug-85 11:30:56 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1056 Posted: Wed Aug 28 11:30:56 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 30-Aug-85 00:57:11 EDT References: <314@tekla.UUCP> <4206@alice.UUCP> <826@burl.UUCP> <2590@ihnss.UUCP> Reply-To: wmartin@brl-bmd.UUCP Distribution: net Organization: USAMC ALMSA, St. Louis, MO Lines: 35 In article <2590@ihnss.UUCP> wiso@ihnss.UUCP (Jack Wisowaty) writes: > After getting nowhere trying to explain that >if she could read it it wouldn't be his real signature and the credit card >company would bounce the transaction, he acquiesced and signed with his >left-hand (he's right-handed) a signature befitting a first-grader where >all the letter could be read. She accepted it, the credit-card company >didn't and he had a free night's stay. > Interesting -- I have never seen *any* evidence that any credit-card company EVER looked at the signature on a charge-card form, or even that a bank ever looked at the signature on a check, to verify that the signer was the correct person. If you could get more information about this incident and post it, it would be appreciated -- did your friend notify the credit-card company that there might be a questionable charge coming through from this particular location? Or did he challenge it after receiving the bill and request a copy of the charge slip, and then point out the dissimilarity of signature form? I thought that the signatures were only used as evidence after-the-fact, as verifcation of questionable charges, or as a method to prove the falseness of a charge. After all, it would be an enormous task for any credit-card company to compare signatures on file with those on the millions of charge slips that come through. As for banks, they hardly ever even LOOK at a check these days -- the processing is all done by the magnetic encoded numbers and handled automatically. Only after a bogus check is detected by the account holder would it be looked at by a human (except for the keypunch-like translation of the amount to magnetic digit imprint, which I think happens at the clearinghouse). Thanks for further detail! Regards, Will Martin UUCP/USENET: seismo!brl-bmd!wmartin or ARPA/MILNET: wmartin@almsa-1.ARPA