Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site mot.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcs!mnetor!mot!fred
From: fred@mot.UUCP (Fred Christiansen)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: Legal question on signatures
Message-ID: <267@mot.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Sep-85 15:45:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: mot.267
Posted: Fri Sep 13 15:45:59 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Sep-85 20:24:08 EDT
References: <314@tekla.UUCP> <4206@alice.UUCP> <826@burl.UUCP>, <83@axiom.UUCP>, <1082@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP>
Organization: Motorola Microsystems, Phoenix AZ
Lines: 15

i have had some banks tell i *must* endorse a check, even to deposit, whilst
others have not quibbled over no signature on a deposit.  is there some law
reference i can throw at them the next they insist i endorse a check for
deposit?

as an aside:  elementary school teachers try to teach you to write clearly,
legibly, etc.  so, my signature is fairly legible.  oddly enough, i have been
questioned by banks in Europe and Africa as to whether or not that really *was*
my signature.  why, it was legible!  turns out, these places encourage one to
come up with a complicated signature .. lots of zips, dips, and doo-dads.
-- 
<< Generic disclaimer >>
Fred Christiansen ("Canajun, eh?") @ Motorola Microsystems, Tempe, AZ
UUCP:  {seismo!terak, trwrb!flkvax, utzoo!mnetor, ihnp4!btlunix}!mot!fred
ARPA:  oakhill!mot!fred@ut-sally.ARPA             AT&T:  602-438-3472