Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: Mail routing -- problems showing up
Message-ID: <166@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 10:44:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: graffiti.166
Posted: Tue Sep  3 10:44:57 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Sep-85 06:09:56 EDT
References: <9413@ucbvax.ARPA> <543@down.FUN> <9530@ucbvax.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 7

> Sorry to all you who KNEW this already, but I thought I'd better
> make sure Peter isn't at a disadvantage in this discussion.

While we're talking about the people who *know* things already, did you
ever consider that pure-uucp paths are *also* RPN, with just one seperator.
In fact unless you can freely intermix '.' and '@', you can't really claim
that they are seperators and not operators.