Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 (Fortune 01.1b1); site graffiti.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!gymble!umcp-cs!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!shell!graffiti!peter
From: peter@graffiti.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: Mail routing -- problems showing up
Message-ID: <170@graffiti.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 11:35:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: graffiti.170
Posted: Tue Sep  3 11:35:08 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Sep-85 06:11:14 EDT
References: <1383@peora.UUCP> <9546@ucbvax.ARPA> <1423@peora.UUCP>
Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX
Lines: 7

> languages, though, and is the strong point of the proposed all-! language,
> eventhough I tend to doubt that language is practical for other reasons
> related to the need to know all other route-specifying languages at the
> gateways, which is an unreasonable requirement in the real world.)

Why do you have to know this? Just convert it into *your* routing language &
pass it on until it hits the next gateway.