Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!mcnc!duke!aff From: aff@duke.UUCP (Amr Fahmy) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: A new coding problem Message-ID: <6218@duke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 2-Sep-85 12:17:37 EDT Article-I.D.: duke.6218 Posted: Mon Sep 2 12:17:37 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Sep-85 06:39:52 EDT Organization: Duke University Lines: 53 HERE IS A PROBLEM, I NEED A SOLUTION !!! I worked on the following problem for a long time, no solution. This is the second posting of this problem on net.math. The first posting was in the summer and I got only 1 reply. I think the fact that it was the summer vacation had a lot to do with the number of replies I got back. If you know anything related, a solution, NP-completeness, clues, to the problem, please reply. /*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ The problem : Let S be the set of all binary words of length n. Let E be a set containg exactly L of the words in S. Define C(E) = sigma min diff(x,e) x in S e in E where diff(x,y) = m if x and y are two binary words that are different in exactly m bits. Of course m <= n. to be the cost of the set E. Now given the two integers n and L, the problem is to construct a set E such that C(E) is minimum. /*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Example : Suppose n=4 and L=4, we can construct the following two sets : E1 = { 0000, E2 = { 0000, 0011, 0001, 1100, 1110, 1111 } 1111 } C(E1) = 16 C(E2) = 12 Of course the set E2 is more desirable than E1, in fact E2 is ONE of the optimal sets I am lookoing for, you cannot find a set E3 with cost less than 12 !! /*------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Amr Fahmy aff@duke ..!mcnc!duke!aff