Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (MU) 9/23/84; site aaec.OZ Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!munnari!basser!aaec!rpb From: rpb@aaec.OZ (Bob Backstrom) Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: A number theory problem Message-ID: <482@aaec.OZ> Date: Sun, 1-Sep-85 23:54:33 EDT Article-I.D.: aaec.482 Posted: Sun Sep 1 23:54:33 1985 Date-Received: Fri, 6-Sep-85 04:20:28 EDT References: <388@aero.ARPA> Organization: Australian Atomic Energy Commission Lines: 48 > > Most of you have probably heard the story of Ramanujan, who was riding > in the cab with a friend. They were discussing his room number 1729, > when his friend remarked that it was an uninteresting number. > "Oh no" Ramanujan replied. "it is the smallest number that can be written > as the sum of two cubes in two different ways". > > My question is, what is the smallest number that can be written as the > sum of two cubes in THREE different ways? Does one exist? > > Bill Sinclair (asbestos Willie) [ I am posting this reply to the net after getting Unknown Host when mailing to "sinclair@aero.ARPA" ] I had looked at exactly this problem some years ago and found the first four such solutions as follows: 3 3 87,539,319 = 167 + 436 3 3 = 228 + 423 3 3 = 255 + 414 3 3 119,824,488 = 11 + 493 3 3 = 90 + 492 3 3 = 346 + 428 3 3 143,604,279 = 111 + 522 3 3 = 359 + 460 3 3 = 408 + 423 3 3 175,959,000 = 70 + 560 3 3 = 198 + 552 3 3 = 315 + 525 From Bob Backstrom at the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.