Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site boring.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!seismo!mcvax!boring!lambert From: lambert@boring.UUCP Newsgroups: net.math Subject: Re: probability formula needed Message-ID: <6621@boring.UUCP> Date: Mon, 9-Sep-85 23:16:42 EDT Article-I.D.: boring.6621 Posted: Mon Sep 9 23:16:42 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Sep-85 20:14:35 EDT References: <3210001@csd2.UUCP> Reply-To: lambert@mcvax.UUCP (Lambert Meertens) Organization: CWI, Amsterdam Lines: 35 Summary: 88.7% Apparently-To: rnews@mcvax.LOCAL > pick any three cards from a deck of (52) playing cards, ignoring the > suit. if you get a duplicate, pick another one. find all the > combinations of pairs you can have. for example, if you pick the > king, seven and three, you can have > > k 7, 7 k, 3 7, 7 3, k 3, 3 k (clearly 6 choices). > > now, return the cards to the deck, shuffle to your heart's content, and > start dealing out the cards in any order. what will happen in most of the > cases is that 2 consecutive cards will be one of your choices. in other > words, if you have dealt out > > q a 2 3 1 k 4 7 3, > > you would "win" because the last 2 cards were 7 and 3, one of your choices. > things like "k k" don't count, but "k k 3" is fine. > > does anyone know how to figure out the probability of this problem? 2404226057 My computations resulted in a probability of ---------- for "winning" 2710423730 (assuming that the shuffling leaves a completely random permutation of the deck), which is a tiny bit above 88.7% Can anyone corroborate this? Lambert Meertens ...!{seismo,okstate,garfield,decvax,philabs}!lambert@mcvax.UUCP CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Amsterdam -- Lambert Meertens ...!{seismo,okstate,garfield,decvax,philabs}!lambert@mcvax.UUCP CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Amsterdam