Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/17/84; site bcsaic.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!bonnie!akgua!whuxlm!harpo!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!pamp From: pamp@bcsaic.UUCP (pam pincha) Newsgroups: net.med,net.kids,net.social Subject: Re: Changing Left-handedness to Right-handedness Message-ID: <270@bcsaic.UUCP> Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 14:22:40 EDT Article-I.D.: bcsaic.270 Posted: Fri Sep 6 14:22:40 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 03:59:55 EDT References: <127@unc.unc.UUCP> <464@petrus.UUCP> <413@ihlpm.UUCP> <12@mss.UUCP> Reply-To: pamp@bcsaic.UUCP (pam pincha) Organization: Boeing Computer Services AI Center, Seattle Lines: 35 Xref: watmath net.med:2324 net.kids:1913 net.social:939 Summary: In article <12@mss.UUCP> jpj@mss.UUCP (J. P. Jenal) writes: >When I was but a wee lad, my Father found me practicing my penmanship and, >deciding that I was doing horribly left-handed, insisted that I should do >things the "right" way. Thus I changed to writing right-handed. Needless >to say that is how my Father wrote - and did everything else that way as >well. I got even though because I persisted in throwing and batting lefty >which he could never abide. > >In the end I have ended up sort of a weird hybrid - > Right Handed Activities | Left Handed Activities > | > Eating | Throwing > Writing | Batting > Shoot | Bowl > Pull a bow | Sex (gotcha! :-) > >Bottom line - no stuttering, no spatial disorientation, I can still play >guitar, even walk and chew gum at the same time. Course I *do* teach high >school - maybe I'm more damaged than I realize? > Actually this is not so unusual. If you look up Science ,August 16,1985, (v.229,n.4714,p.665-668) S.F.Witelson's The brain connection, you will find that "consistent left-handers" are RARE!("consistent left-handers" are ones who use ONLY their left hand for activities) What is more typically the case is that there is a "mixed-handedness" that is more left-hand oriented. Mind you, handedness is not determined on writing hand alone. Best reference for this is Annett,M.,1967,Q.J.Exp.Psychol.,v.19,p.327-? -This is refernced by Whitelson,and seems to contain the basic statistics for how many,and what constitutes handednes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pam Pincha-Wagener (usual disclaimer)