Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/13/84; site intelca.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!oliveb!hplabs!intelca!cem
From: cem@intelca.UUCP (Chuck McManis)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.arch,net.research
Subject: Re: Info wanted on In-circuit-emulators (ICE)
Message-ID: <59@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 11:08:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: intelca.59
Posted: Fri Sep  6 11:08:07 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 7-Sep-85 13:56:46 EDT
References: <321@sesame.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.micro:11857 net.arch:1746 net.research:214

> **This one's for the line eater**
> 
> I am in the process of evaluating _currently_available_ ICE
> systems for use with 8088/8086/80286 processors, and have not
> had much luck finding a good system.
> 
> I would appreciate any experiences/information/rumors you have,
> particularly in terms of ease of use and transparency of
> different ICE systems.

If you really want a good ICE unit get an I^2ICE from Intel. It
was after all, designed for the part :-) I have used one on my
job several times and always found that its operation was identical
to that of the "real" chip. 

--Chuck
(* Forget the disclaimer, I work for Intel and I happen to know it
   is Intel's opinion that all serious debug work on *86 designs
   should be done with I2ICE [pronounced eye-squared-ice]          *)
-- 
                                            - - - D I S C L A I M E R - - - 
{ihnp4,fortune}!dual\                     All opinions expressed herein are my
        {qantel,idi}-> !intelca!cem       own and not those of my employer, my
 {ucbvax,hao}!hplabs/                     friends, or my avocado plant. :-}