Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site terak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!hao!noao!terak!doug
From: doug@terak.UUCP (Doug Pardee)
Newsgroups: net.micro.6809,net.micro.68k
Subject: Re: OS9 on Amiga
Message-ID: <712@terak.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Sep-85 11:40:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: terak.712
Posted: Tue Sep 10 11:40:07 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Sep-85 12:22:46 EDT
References: <576@sftig.UUCP>
Organization: Calcomp Display Products Division, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Lines: 9
Xref: watmath net.micro.6809:489 net.micro.68k:1109

> Or is there something about OS9 that makes this less sensible than I think
> it is?

Last time I'd heard, OS9/68K used unaligned operands, and so would only
work on the 68008 and 68020 CPUs, not the 68000, 68010, and 68012.

Does anyone know differently?
-- 
Doug Pardee -- CalComp -- {calcom1,savax,seismo,decvax,ihnp4}!terak!doug