Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site sesame.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!panda!talcott!sesame!slerner From: slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner) Newsgroups: net.micro.pc Subject: Re: Re: More dongles Message-ID: <305@sesame.UUCP> Date: Sun, 25-Aug-85 01:07:47 EDT Article-I.D.: sesame.305 Posted: Sun Aug 25 01:07:47 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Aug-85 02:36:10 EDT References: <53500017@trsvax> <225@omen.UUCP> Organization: Lotus Development Corp Lines: 35 > > If each dongle delays the serial data several character times, cascading > enough of the buggers will make a good serial memory! At 1200 bps, 500 > dongles with 4 characters of storage each (2000 total) would cause a > delay greater than 16 seonds. This would make the serial port virtually > useless for communications. > > A better solution would be for ADAPSO to develop a version of the 8088 > with a serial number burned in to it. The software would then be installed > for that particular CPU serial number, with a certain number of invocations > allowed on other machines for emergencies. > > Serialized CPU's might also be useful in tracking stolen equipment. > Please read previous postings on the ADAPSO key/keyring system. Unlike the UK dongles, the ADAPSO keyring system does NOT daisy chain - ONE kering does all communications for MANY keys, therefore propogation delays are minimal. Serial numbers in CPUs will not be acceptable for many reasons, starting with what to do if your machine dies up to and including what to do if you want to take some software home for non-simultaneous use?? -- Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus Development Corp. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner slerner%sesame@harvard.ARPA