Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucuxc
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!german
From: german@uiucuxc.Uiuc.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: DOS 3.0 BACKUP Bug???
Message-ID: <21900079@uiucuxc>
Date: Tue, 3-Sep-85 09:54:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucuxc.21900079
Posted: Tue Sep  3 09:54:00 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Sep-85 03:23:14 EDT
References: <528@linus.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:linus.UUCP:-52800:uiucuxc:21900079:000:645
Nf-From: uiucuxc.Uiuc.ARPA!german    Sep  3 08:54:00 1985


>>A couple of friends of mine are going to buy ATs with DOS 3.00.  Would
>>someone please tell me what is wrong with BACKUP in DOS 3.00?  And...
>>is there any problem with BACKUP in DOS 3.10?

DOS 3.0 BACKUP command sometimes writes a 0 for which disk of the backup it
is.  You can use debug to re-write this one file with a non-zero value to
get around this problem.  
DOS 3.1 does not have this problem.

         Greg German

UUCP:	 {ihnp4,pur-ee,convex}!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!german
ARPANET: german%uiucuxc@uiuc.arpa
CSNET:	 german%uiucuxc@uiuc.csnet
US Mail: Univ of Illinois, CSO, 1304 W Springfield Ave, Urbana, IL  61801
Phone:	 217-333-8293