Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site scgvaxd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sdcrdcf!trwrb!scgvaxd!kvc
From: kvc@scgvaxd.UUCP (Kevin Carosso)
Newsgroups: net.misc.coke
Subject: Re: Cherry Coke
Message-ID: <388@scgvaxd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 23-Aug-85 15:07:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: scgvaxd.388
Posted: Fri Aug 23 15:07:56 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 27-Aug-85 01:53:26 EDT
References: <1069@ihlpg.UUCP> <2269@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: kvc@scgvaxd.UUCP (Kevin Carosso)
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 23
Summary: 

In article <2269@sdcrdcf.UUCP> steve@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Steve Holtsberg) writes:
>
>Cherry RC came to LA first, and I tried it and it was pretty good.
>Then when Cherry Coke got here (just the other day), I bought it
>thinking it would be even better.  WRONG!!!!!  It's just terrible
>(in my opinion).  Has anyone else tried it?  Anyone agree with me?

Boy, no kidding!!!   I tried the stuff (Cherry Coke, not RC) first at a
Fuddrucker's out in Montclair (So. Cal.) way back in June and it was pretty
good.  (I dunno how Fuddrucker's got it so soon...  I didn't see it ANYWHERE
else for months...  I hadn't even heard of it before I tried one.)

The stuff I got recently, however, doesn't taste nearly as good.  Tastes
kinda dusty...  like it sat in someone's pyramid for 4000 years... wierd...
Still better than that new coke crap when ya gotta have something outa the
machine...

	/Kevin Carosso          {allegra|seismo|ihnp4}!scgvaxd!engvax!kvc
	 Hughes Aircraft Co.

ps.  How come we haven't got Classic out here yet?  Maybe Coke knew our
     discriminating So Cal taste buds would expose it for the hoax it really
     is, too soon for the market?   HFCS indeed!!!      :-)