Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 / ST 1.0; site saber.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!saber!msc
From: msc@saber.UUCP (Mark Callow)
Newsgroups: net.misc.coke
Subject: coke formulae
Message-ID: <1755@saber.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Aug-85 15:42:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: saber.1755
Posted: Mon Aug 26 15:42:49 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Aug-85 11:15:11 EDT
Distribution: net
Organization: Saber Technology, San Jose, CA
Lines: 16

Nobody has mentioned this before so... (in the last 2 weeks anyway)

Many years ago, soon after Coca-Cola (it wasn't even called Coke then)
started appearing in cans, I read that they used a different formula
for the canned variety than the bottled variety.  Later, after it
started appearing in plastic bottles, I heard that they used yet
another formula for those.  The reason given was various reactions with
the material of the alternative containers.

This was so long ago that I cannot remember the reference.  Also it
was in England.  I have always preferred coke from glass over all
the other packaging forms.
-- 
From the TARDIS of Mark Callow
msc@saber.UUCP,  sun!saber!msc@decwrl.ARPA
...{decwrl,ucbvax}!sun!saber!msc, ...{amdcad,ihnp4}!saber!msc