Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lasspvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!lasspvax!silber
From: silber@lasspvax.UUCP (Jeffrey Silber)
Newsgroups: net.misc.coke
Subject: Re: Is the war over yet?
Message-ID: <508@lasspvax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Sep-85 23:12:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: lasspvax.508
Posted: Wed Sep  4 23:12:28 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Sep-85 03:19:10 EDT
References: <3535@dartvax.UUCP> <827@lll-crg.UUCP>
Reply-To: silber@lasspvax.UUCP (Jeffrey Silber)
Distribution: net
Organization: LASSP, Cornell University
Lines: 10
Keywords: `New' Coke, Where?, We won! Don't Blame me, I'm from boston.
Summary: 




The judget that ordered Coca Cola to disclose the formula did so because they
are being sued on the grounds that bottlers were overcharged for syrup.  In
order to find out the truth the actual materials in the syrup need to be
disclosed.  Coke, of course, refused.  It is doubtful that compliance is in
the cards.  Appeals, and out-of-court settlements can either prevent the
necessity of revealing the formula, or delay it for years.  In other words,
don't expect to see the formula in the near future.