Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!amdimage!amdcad!decwrl!dm_johnson@manana.DEC
From: dm_johnson@manana.DEC
Newsgroups: net.motss
Subject: bisexuals untrustworthy?
Message-ID: <162@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 27-Aug-85 02:26:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: decwrl.162
Posted: Tue Aug 27 02:26:34 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 30-Aug-85 00:18:55 EDT
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 12


In the case described I think the person was untrustworthy and hetero/homo
was probably not the issue. It may have helped to confuse the issue but was
not the underlying issue.

In general, I suscribe to the one need/ either sex theory. That has an 
implicit assumption that one is monogamous because both partners have
discussed and indicated a preference for monogamy. A bisexual who is satisfying
a desire for the same sex at the same time he is invoved with a person of
the opposite sex is only fooling himself and, probably, hurting others.

dj