Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ccvaxa
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece
From: preece@ccvaxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Kelvin stinks!!!!!!!!!!!
Message-ID: <3200010@ccvaxa>
Date: Fri, 6-Sep-85 12:30:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccvaxa.3200010
Posted: Fri Sep  6 12:30:00 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 9-Sep-85 00:40:07 EDT
References: <4874@stolaf.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:stolaf.UUCP:-487400:ccvaxa:3200010:000:873
Nf-From: ccvaxa.UUCP!preece    Sep  6 11:30:00 1985


> First you criticize Kelvin and now you want a copy of his latest
> review.  Not only are you an over-sensitive pansy-ass, but you're a
> hypocrite as well..  /* Written  6:45 pm  Aug 29, 1985 by
> cjbiggin@watmath.UUCP in ccvaxa:net.movies */
----------
I THINK the flame at Kelvin that you were responding to was meant as
satire in the same vein as Kelvin's reviews.  This isn't particularly
more clear than that Kelvin's reviews aren't the work of the total
moron that they superficially appear to be, but I think the request
for the latest was specifically mean to be a give away of satirical
intent.  I suppose maybe your response was also meant in the same
way.  Sigh.

Who cares.  I still think it's a pretty dumb form of humor ("Hey,
look how dumb I am!  Aren't dumb people funny?!"), but at least
it's not pompous...

-- 
scott preece
ihnp4!uiucdcs!ccvaxa!preece