Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hound!rfg
From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES)
Newsgroups: net.audio,net.music
Subject: Re: Sound quality of CDs
Message-ID: <1344@hound.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Sep-85 16:32:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: hound.1344
Posted: Wed Sep  4 16:32:02 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Sep-85 20:11:14 EDT
References: <446@cmu-cs-spice.ARPA>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.audio:5745 net.music:9097

[]
...the sound quality is inexcusable...
...is digital equipment hard to find?

1) Why not do what you would do with a bad analog record?
   ...  take it back.  That would help get the message across.

2) If the artist goes in for a lot of artistic hanky-panky like
   multi-channel mushing around with lots of signal processing
   on various tracks(flanging here, compressing to hell there,
   fuzzing everywhere) that sort of thing is difficult and/or
   rare to do digitally.  That could be why.  Or it could just be
   he's tired of waiting for Japan, Inc. to allow him time to 
   press a disc.

-- 

"It's the thought, if any, that counts!"  Dick Grantges  hound!rfg